October 4, 2011
“The present study, funded by CPHI (Canadian Health Population Initiative), reviews the body of evidence associated with the return on investment (ROI)i of mental health promotion and mental illness prevention.ii The specific research question being addressed is as follows:
‘What are the extent, range and nature of research activity in the area of economic analysis of mental health promotion and mental illness prevention?’”
“Both peer-reviewed (2001 to 2011) and grey literature sources were explored.The review shows that several systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses make the case for investing in mental health promotion and mental illness prevention, although the number of randomized controlled trials in each area is low. This report shows evidence of this finding for the health, education and workplace sectors and, to a lesser extent, the criminal justice and social services sectors, recognizing that there are considerable overlaps among these categories and studies.”
Click here to read the full article
Posted in READ Portal, Reports & Papers | Tagged with Canada, Chronic disease, Disease management, Mental health | No Comments
March 9, 2011
This synthesis and the concluding policy options represent a starting place for more in-depth exploration by CHSRF, and will inform policy dialogues on how best to ensure accessible, high-quality and sustainable healthcare for Canadians.
This report synthesizes the current body of knowledge on cost drivers in Canadian healthcare. Cost drivers are factors that bring about increased spending on healthcare. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of cost drivers is essential to a productive debate on the sustainability of Canada’s publicly funded healthcare systems.
Posted in READ Portal, Reports & Papers | Tagged with Canada, Economics, Funding, Health planning, Hospital administration, Indicators, Mental health, Policy | No Comments
November 30, 2010
Does integration of care act as a barrier to choice and competition? This question has long been debated and highlights the complexities and nuances of the issue. The debate should be informed by evidence on the performance of integrated systems – and by greater clarity on the terminology used.
Posted in READ Portal, Reports & Papers | Tagged with Benchmarking, Evidence-based, Integrated care, Mental health, Program evaluation | No Comments
